1. The use of Web 2.0 tools and spaces is encouraged
at work for organization-related functions: connecting with patrons and staff,
enhancing participation and collaboration, offering better education/training
programs and services as well as promoting goodwill of the organisation. The
organisation’s policies on communications and the use of information technology
also apply to the use of Web 2.0 tools and space. (Fleet, 2009; Princeton
University, 2011) Training on technical
management issues in the socially networked environment and guidelines on the
use of common social media tools should be provided to employees when
necessary. (Society for New Communications Research, n.d.)
2. Organisational accounts on the social media platforms must be created by an authorized representative of the department/unit, who is also responsible for operating and monitoring the account on an ongoing basis. Information about the account and the contact information for the designated staff should be submitted to the administrators of the Communications Department and the Computer & Information Technology department. (Princeton University, 2011, pp.2-3) Employees should create separate accounts for professional and private use.
3. The Web 2.0 service organiser must consider accessibility issues in the use of that technology, and offer alternative programs for those who are unable to use Web 2.0 technology. (Arendt, 2009)
4. Service organizers should consider the data protection aspects of their Web 2.0 activities, whether it involves the transfer of personal data. Attention should also be drawn to the risk of releasing confidential information or proprietary information about the organisation and its students, employees or alumni. Employees who share confidential information without appropriate authorization are subject to disciplinary action or termination. (Arendt, 2009)
5. On writing/commenting/contents
. When employees post or comment on
organization social sites, they are representing the organization and have to
be responsible for what they write. Names and job titles are to be included as appropriate.
(Lauby, 2009)
. Expression of personal views should be clearly stated, as distinct
from the company’s perspective. (Society
for New Communications Research, n.d.)
. Information provided should be checked for
accuracy. Mistakes should be acknowledged and errors
fixed in a timely and open manner. (Society for New Communications Research,
n.d.)
. Rights and permissions must be obtained
before using copyrighted or proprietary materials and proper attribution
should be given. (Fleet, 2009)
. Our institution is a non-profit organization. Hence, our
Web 2.0 services should be free from commercial
advertising and political propaganda.
. Staff have to strike a balance between time spent on social media
and other work. (Lauby, 2009)
References
Arendt, A.M. (2009). Social Media Tools and the Policies Associated with
Them. Best Practices in Policy Management Conference,
Utah Valley University, November, 2009. http://works.bepress.com/anne_arendt/7
Chartered Institute of Public Relations, Europe. (2013, December). CIPR Social Media Best Practice Guide. Retrieved
from http://www.cipr.co.uk/content/social-media-guidance
Fleet, D. (2009, October 18). Social Media Policies E-book [slides]. Retrieved
from http://www.slideshare.net/davefleet/social-media-policies-ebook
Lauby, S. (2009, February 6) 10
Must-Haves for Your Social Media Policy [blog]. http://mashable.com/2009/06/02/social-media-policy-musts/
Princeton University · Office of Communications (2011). Princeton University Social Media Policies. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/communications/services/social-media/061611_Princeton_Social_Media_Policies.pdf
Society for New Communications Research. (n.d.). Best practices for developing a social media policy. Retrieved from http://socialmedia.biz/social-media-policies/best-practices-for-developing-a-social-media-policy/
No comments:
Post a Comment